The ClearOS Enterprise 5.2 Beta 2 release is here! The big news with this release is the available upgrade path from ClarkConnect 5.0. Please keep in mind that this is still a beta, so proceed with the usual caution. Other changes since 5.2 Beta 1 include:
- Fixed Samba winadmin password reset
- Fixed mail aliases page
- Fixed help links
- Optimized LDAP
- Added support for encrypted file systems on software RAID devices
Please read the release notes for more information.
Comments
(13)
good job on the optimization but i think there's a bug in enabling the Windows Networking....it keeps on notifying "Parameter is invalid - Username" while enabling the service. If i'll add the winadmin user in the user module it will notify me then that the "user is already exist". With this can't start the windows networking service.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Thanks for the fix...it is working now...i can fully test it in our setup. Thanks a lot!
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Hi Arya / Peter,
I think keeping squid 3.1 for version 6 is a good idea - we want tried and tested, not bugs! I would love to try the new version, but all in good time.
hint @ Peter: perhaps the inclusion of Squid 3.1 would go nicely on the 'road map' page under 6 ;-)
Votes: +0
I think keeping squid 3.1 for version 6 is a good idea - we want tried and tested, not bugs! I would love to try the new version, but all in good time.
hint @ Peter: perhaps the inclusion of Squid 3.1 would go nicely on the 'road map' page under 6 ;-)
report abuse
vote down
vote up
I've been wondering if the two can be used simultaneously, i am experiencing some weird problem like some of my user's in our test environment can't access samba shares while the flexshare is enabled while others can. But when i disabled the flexshare all of them can connect hassle free. Is there any conflict between the two service?
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
why not to implements squid 3.1 on clearos version 5.2?
written by Arya Natanael Toshioki , July 01, 2010
written by Arya Natanael Toshioki , July 01, 2010
@Peter
What is "HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR"? Why does squid provide it to WWW servers, and how can I stop it?
see. Security - X-Forwarded-For
When a proxy-cache is used, a server does not see the connection coming from the originating client. Many people like to implement access controls based on the client address. To accommodate these people, Squid adds the request header called "X-Forwarded-For" which looks like this:
X-Forwarded-For: 128.138.243.150, unknown, 192.52.106.30
Entries are always IP addresses, or the word unknown if the address could not be determined or if it has been disabled with the forwarded_for configuration option.
We must note that access controls based on this header are extremely weak and simple to fake. Anyone may hand-enter a request with any IP address whatsoever. This is perhaps the reason why client IP addresses have been omitted from the HTTP/1.1 specification.
Because of the weakness of this header, access controls based on X-Forwarded-For are not used by default. It's needs to be specifically enabled with follow_x_forwarded_for.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Sq...ffaf3dd27f
this will answer, x_forwarder_for is not to important
squid is useful for help load of my internet line, cause they do cache an similar object on my harddisk space in the server
Votes: +2
What is "HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR"? Why does squid provide it to WWW servers, and how can I stop it?
see. Security - X-Forwarded-For
When a proxy-cache is used, a server does not see the connection coming from the originating client. Many people like to implement access controls based on the client address. To accommodate these people, Squid adds the request header called "X-Forwarded-For" which looks like this:
X-Forwarded-For: 128.138.243.150, unknown, 192.52.106.30
Entries are always IP addresses, or the word unknown if the address could not be determined or if it has been disabled with the forwarded_for configuration option.
We must note that access controls based on this header are extremely weak and simple to fake. Anyone may hand-enter a request with any IP address whatsoever. This is perhaps the reason why client IP addresses have been omitted from the HTTP/1.1 specification.
Because of the weakness of this header, access controls based on X-Forwarded-For are not used by default. It's needs to be specifically enabled with follow_x_forwarded_for.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Sq...ffaf3dd27f
this will answer, x_forwarder_for is not to important
squid is useful for help load of my internet line, cause they do cache an similar object on my harddisk space in the server
report abuse
vote down
vote up
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.




I'll wait for the official release before I start my testing ;-)
David